Sometime Between: Living Archives and the Power of Black Agency

This post is the introduction to our online roundtable on Judith Weisenfeld’s New World A-Coming

1928 Moorish Science Temple Conclave in Chicago. Noble Ali Drew can be seen in white in the front row center (Credit: Wikimedia)

In the opening pages of New World A-Coming: Black Religion and Racial Identity During the Great Migration, Judith Weisenfeld tells a memorable story about Alec Brown Bey, a South Carolina native who appeared before the Philadelphia draft board to register during the Second World War. Brown Bey’s story was that of millions of other Black southerners who headed North during the Great Migration, and one of nearly thirteen million men who answered the call to register.

Weisenfeld paints a picture of a man, who, before his arrival in Philadelphia, would likely have been fine being categorized “Negro” by the draft registrar–George Richman–as he would have been satisfied with being registered as Alec Brown. “But sometime between settling in Philadelphia [probably in the late 1930s] and appearing before the draft board in 1942, Brown had become a member of the Moorish Science Temple of America” (2). This meant that Alec Brown could no longer be satisfied with the title “Negro” as his faith commanded that he deny that designation, and accept the truth of his racial and religious identity. As such, he asked Richman to properly represent him as Alec Brown Bey, Moorish American.

Brown Bey’s story simultaneously evokes a picture of the mundane lives of everyday Black people and the distinctiveness of Black religiosity at the turn of the twentieth century. Like Alec Brown Bey, Black folks who migrated from the South just after the turn of the 20th century navigated complex religious spaces where religious transformations meant an intentional wrestling with who they were racially inasmuch as who they were religiously.

Set in the backdrop of the Great Migration, Weisenfeld effectively transforms a rich array of archival materials, like a two-page draft registration, from a sterile document into a living, breathing religious body that we can feel on the pages. In a nearly four hundred page text, Weisenfeld nimbly moves among three parts (“Narratives,” “Selfhood,” and “Community”), teaching us about the religious leaders of Ethiopian Hebrew congregations, the Nation of Islam (NOI), the Moorish Science Temple (MST), and Father Divine’s Peace Mission (PM), including the lives of Noble Drew Ali, Father Divine, and Wallace D. Fard. But as Weisenfeld astutely notes, the archives illuminate the stories of the people who occupy the less prominent spaces, or the sometime between, and reveal the narratives of much less prominent but no less important keepers of the religious and community formation at the local level, including Carrie peoples, Joseph Nathaniel Beckles, Faithful Mary, J. Pearsall Bey, Squire Bryant Bey, Reuben Frazier Bey, and Happy S. Love.

And it is Weisenfeld’s illumination of the spaces and places sometime between that makes New World A-Coming so noteworthy. The monograph is impeccably researched and paints a colorful picture of religious diversity among Black people. In so doing, she further dismantles what William D. Hart aptly characterizes as the “standard narrative of black religion as the black [Christian] church.” She also successfully constructs a narrative that traverses the sometime between where the repudiation of Negro identity and that of unquestioning assimilation to an American national norm resulted in nuanced and complicated emphases on the history of  racial construction during a migratory era. Weisenfeld dismantles the idea that race making lies solely or predominantly in the hands of whites. Agency, she contends, has always been the work of Black religious subjects, and especially so in regards to how they construct, revise, or reject racial categories.

The essays in this roundtable on New World A-Coming take seriously the ways that Weisenfeld’s archival dwellings tell the stories of Black religious agency anew. Danielle Brune Sigler reminds us of just how important having access to original archival records can be and encourages the careful use of said sources. In “Uncovering New Sources for Research on Black Religion,” she lauds Weisenfeld’s methodological depth and breadth with attention to the vast array of federal, state, and archival records as well as online databases (including death certificates, naturalization forms, marriage census records, and even that range from the popular to the mundane. The wealth of information Weisenfeld unearths effectively fills archival gaps and in so doing, gives further credence to the religio-racial identities as lived on the ground by individual adherents, and enriches the landscape of Black religion at the turn of the twentieth century.

The essays in this roundtable also constructively interrogate the ambiguity of sometime between, or the varied locations where, according to Weisenfeld, Black religious diversity and racial construction intersect. Emily Suzanne Clark applauds the thematic (as opposed to chronological) structure of the text and explicates how New World A-Coming attends to the lived realities and theological perspectives of real life religious individuals. In “Rethinking Religion and Race in the Great Migration,” Clark takes up Weisenfeld’s use of “religio-racial” to further explore the corporeal spaces where religio-racial identity is created and inhabited while seeking greater clarity in the sometime between child-rearing, family dynamics, sexuality, and gender.

Chernoh Sesay Jr. further notes the ways Weisenfeld’s structural scope deftly maneuvers among the tensions of gender (including an underlying and unintrusive theme of masculinity) that permeates throughout the varied experiences of religious practitioners during the interwar urban North. Sesay also succinctly locates Weisenfeld’s place in a long and steadily growing lineage of sociological, ethnographic, literary, and historical scholarship on race consciousness and religion. Lastly, Tisa Wenger draws a comparison of the Reform and Zionist movements within American Jewish history to make a compelling case for considering nation, nationality, race, and religion as multiple yet complementary axes of difference. In “The Complexities of Racial and Religious Identities,” Wenger suggests that these axes comprise their own sometime between and collectively informed the efforts of members of Ethiopian Hebrews, NOI, MST and PM black participants to relocate their communities while reconfiguring their religio-racial identities.

From these thoughtful responses to Weisenfeld’s engaging historical exegesis we see the intimate relationship between the power of remaking categories and that of remaking the self. After all, community building and faith are never far from notions of peoplehood, religious history, and racial identity. In the end, as Weisenfeld so clearly and convincingly argues, the power of self-fashioning for black members of religious communities at the turn of the twentieth century lie in the sometime between expression, nation, experience, community, and faith.

Share with a friend:
Copyright © AAIHS. May not be reprinted without permission.


Rhon Manigault-Bryant

LeRhonda S. Manigault-Bryant is Associate Professor of Africana Studies at Williams College. She is the author of Talking to the Dead: Religion, Music, and Lived Memory among Gullah/Geechee Women (Duke University Press), and co-author of Womanist and Black Feminist Responses to Tyler Perry’s Productions (Palgrave Macmillan) with Tamura A. Lomax and Carol B. Duncan. You can find her adding colorful commentary to the digital universe via Twitter @DoctorRMB.

Comments on “Sometime Between: Living Archives and the Power of Black Agency

  • Avatar

    Great read! Thank you! And will read the book!

    • Avatar

      Thanks so very much Yana, for taking the time to read this, and for your reply!

  • Avatar

    Thanks, Rhon, for starting the discussion in such a thoughtful way. I’m captivated by the framework of “sometime between” that you draw out from the book and have been thinking a great deal about its broader applicability in Africana religious studies.

  • Avatar

    I’m looking forward to the roundtable and discussion here. I discovered this book via the review in the JAAR and the award from the Journal of Africana Religions. I devoured it over the course of a week and am still processing everything. I too like the ‘sometime between’ frame and the richness it implies both historically and also theologically as an eschatological echo of sorts.

    As a white scholar of these topics, I’m continually seeking to re-frame how we talk about history knowing that framing is a powerful academic tool. “Slavery times” becomes “Time of enslavement” and “Slavery” being used to refer to the system of enslavement, being but one example.

    This book helped me reframe the Great Migration as more than stories of “Internally displaced people” but also a time of great creative flourishing among African Americans. In the same way that conjure represents this flourishing during the time of enslavement (and beyond), these movements represent another wave of religious creativity.

    • Avatar

      I’m so glad to hear you found the book helpful, Kirk, and I agree that one of the exciting things about Rhon’s “sometime between” is its richness for discussing historical and transformation and hope for varied sorts of spiritual transformation.

      • Avatar

        Yes. My mind has been weaving and unraveling a number of permutations about how various communities might see themselves in liminal times between the “already” and “not yet.” Your example in the book of NOI members taking the surname X as a placeholder until Fard would return to give them their true name being one of those threads.

  • Avatar

    I plan to give this one a read through. Thanks for this. As someone who is in many ways a product of the said organizations that are being discussed in this book, I am particularly interested in seeing how the author views the current Moorish movement and its own rearview lens on itself, if that is even a topic of discussion in this particular work.

    • Avatar

      Thanks for reading and commenting, James. The book focuses on the 1920s through the 1950s, so the question of the current Moorish movement’s perspective isn’t featured. My research definitely benefited from the work the have done to preserve MST history. Other scholars are working on aspects of the issue you raise, and I’m excited to see how their work develops.

Comments are closed.